JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 7, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido

✓Claimant Marcel Silva Romero

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • No se desconoció precedente jurisprudencial
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-523/17.

La peticionaria presentó varios cargos pero la Corte sólo consideró apto el relacionado con la contrariedad de la jurisprudencia de la Sala Plena de la Corporación en materia de eficacia del medio de control de nulidad y restablecimiento del derecho, en particular, en cuanto a la solicitud de suspensión provisional de los actos administrativos.

La Sala considera que dicho cargo no tiene vocación de prosperidad y NIEGA la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR LA SOLICITUD NULIDAD de la Sentencia T-523 del 10 de agosto de 2017, proferida por la Sala Primera de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Tercero. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.